### Id be interested to know why you couldn't have/didn't test your products via:
(a) a single sided, (one recovery point), pull? I note from above that you say that was not done?; (b) does that mean you only sell them in sets of 2 then; with a warning label not to use them singularly/untested for this?; (c) did you do a "yank test" - NO, not attaching them to a Jeep - but a real world test where Nobles applies an instant (say 6tn+) load on the RPs - at say the equivalent of 30km/h+ velocity.... to see what happens next?
####
(ps: I'm not associated in any way with the 4wd aftermarket accessories industry, and am not an engineer) ..
To answer your above:
* We did a pull test per section, e.g. per side
* Yes, we only sell them in pairs, and we are very clear with our instructions, and selling that they are NOT intended to be used as a single pull point - of course, you can't prevent people doing stupid things - we have had requests to sell a single point, and we won't do that, as it's not in the best interest of the owner or the structural integrity of the vehicle.
* There's no such thing as a "yank test" when WLL rating a product - it's based on a constant increasing load being applied until the product fails. That being said, these have been tested in the wild with a fully loaded vehicle and camper behind, being recovered via gentle pull (not snatched).
Without sounding condescending, snatching ('here we go, watch this, get up it and rip it' - style) is really the uneducated 4WD'ers way of recovering a vehicle that's stuck. It's the YouTube method, and is one of the most attributed methods to causing death in the 4WD community
Between the two of us, we've been driving 4WD's for a collective 60+ years, and neither of us have ever recovered a vehicle that way.