http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/drones-filling-queensland-skies-within-dangerous-proximity-of-aircraft/story-fnihsrk2-1227108980317
There are lots of factual errors in that article. There was alot I agree with too.
Some items that I have an issue with.....
Most cities are covered by controlled airspace but have a floor set on them, so once you get out of 5nm from an airfield the floor is often thousands of feet hight, so flying in a park at greater than 400ft is perfectly legal. As long as you dont then go above the floor alt. Case in point for where I fly, I am not in controlled airspace below several thoughts of feet, but I live in a special area that can be a nofly zone when advised by a NOTAM. Can I access NOTAM's easily, nope and that is a real issue.
You are allowed to fly within 5nm of an airfield you must stay below 400ft. And not fly over the airfield or fly in or around the approach / departure areas. Thats what is in the CASA Regulation, not the fairy tale the person believes.
A sporting field is only a populous area once there are a volume of people. So the odd person on the beach or the park is not considered populous (this is one that I feel the regulation doesn't have enough detail on when it switches so it's a bit subjective)
Commercial RPA operators like to think they are the only ones allowed to fly above 400ft, simply not true. They have to seek approval to do so. Commercial operators are the ones that are banned from a number of things, but they think that their rules apply to hobbyists, sure there are some rules that apply to all but they have additional restrictions on them. It stems from the training they do, they get told it there and then believe it to be true.
There is plenty of existing regulations to that give CASA enforcement powers if a person flys in the vicinity of an airliner.....
I have strong doubts the drone operators he's talking about in the 'controlled' airspace of coolangatta are actually in the controlled part. I've caught out other supposed RPA experts saying a person was in controlled airspace but once educated they realise I was right....
Things I agree with:
Idiots need to stop cloud surfing as it is not allowed at all. Those posting and doing in Australian airspace should be fined. These are the people that are really causing issues for this hobby.
Those flying in places like the harbour bridge, etc.... Should be fined. If they get within 30m of the structure.
I think also people need to realise if they are in public then they have no expectation of privacy at all. That means if you like to sunbake topless or nude in your backyard, then people need to realise they risk being seen by others, including those that might be flying. Camera technology doesnt really allow for people to spy into peoples homes, but I do agree that existing privacy laws should be enforced if people try to see into homes that would not normally be able to from the street should be hit with the existing laws. Plus if people move into the harassment territory then they should also be fined with existing legislation.
I think it shows a sad state of journalism when they cant even get the facts right, now people read this and think it's the truth when it is far from it, so many factual errors.
The above is based upon CASA regulations, the actual law that applies to this, not some fairy tale.
Regards,
Chris