Author Topic: OK, Now We Rock at cricket- What was I thinking :-) (Read 621291 times)

Rumpig · « **Reply #150 on:** December 17, 2013, 08:04:19 PM »

Quote from: D4D on December 17, 2013, 07:42:05 PM

This just in on Broad's foot

comment i heard on ABC radio the other day in regards to a Twitter posting about Broad's foot...He always did have trouble walking

Jasen · « **Reply #151 on:** December 17, 2013, 08:50:09 PM »

Quote from: Mobi on December 17, 2013, 08:02:37 PM

You must be going back for Xmas with the family considering what the weatherise like. Have a safe trip and I was worried at lunch.

It's a great place to come from as long as you don't have to go back too often lol

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

swanny · « **Reply #152 on:** December 18, 2013, 05:35:46 AM »

Quote from: Jasen on December 17, 2013, 08:50:09 PM

It's a great place to come from as long as you don't have to go back too often lol

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Hahaha......theres only one prob with the place...its full of POMS...bugger that....!!!!!

FZJ · « **Reply #153 on:** December 18, 2013, 06:40:32 AM »

The barmy army have a new song for when Warner is batting.


Crickets Chirping Sound Effect

Jasen · « **Reply #154 on:** December 18, 2013, 09:21:52 AM »

Quote from: swanny on December 18, 2013, 05:35:46 AM

Hahaha......theres only one prob with the place...its full of POMS...bugger that....!!!!!

I think there are more Poms here in Perth than Aussies and you can't more for Aussies in London.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

D4D · « **Reply #155 on:** December 22, 2013, 11:13:13 AM »

Another one bites the dust...

Test spinner Graeme Swann retires from England duty with immediate effect
http://www.news.com.au/sport/cricket/test-spinner-graeme-swann-retires-from-england-duty-with-immediate-effect/story-fndpt0dy-1226788284350

D4D · « **Reply #156 on:** December 26, 2013, 09:06:20 AM »

I would have bowled today too but denying the crowd of a Boxing Day 100 from Warner hmmm...

10:04 Surprise, surprise! Michael Clarke has won another toss, four in a row for Australia! However, today Clarke has said his side will bowl first. He says the overhead, overcast conditions helped make his mind up with a bit of grass and moisture on the pitch.

Garfish · « **Reply #157 on:** December 26, 2013, 10:28:23 AM »

0/44 of 13 why are we bowling, when I heard the score I assumed we were batting

alnjan · « **Reply #158 on:** December 27, 2013, 01:12:53 PM »

Yep the worlds best batter just let one go and got bowled out for 10. Aus 3/66

lino6 · « **Reply #159 on:** December 27, 2013, 02:35:26 PM »

Quote from: alnjan on December 27, 2013, 01:12:53 PM

Yep the worlds best batter just let one go and got bowled out for 10. Aus 3/66

3 so far in the match have left balls that hit the wickets. Must be doing a little bit

alnjan · « **Reply #160 on:** December 27, 2013, 09:29:50 PM »

Poms all out for 255 and Aus 9/164

Jasen · « **Reply #161 on:** December 28, 2013, 05:48:31 AM »

So the poms are winning then?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

D4D · « **Reply #162 on:** December 28, 2013, 01:21:22 PM »

Quote from: Jasen on December 28, 2013, 05:48:31 AM

So the poms are winning then?

Not @ 4/ 87

Murph · « **Reply #163 on:** December 28, 2013, 01:32:52 PM »

Mitch just shut up the weight challenged lady!

D4D · « **Reply #164 on:** December 28, 2013, 02:49:13 PM »

England 5/131, not much of a lead...

D4D · « **Reply #165 on:** December 28, 2013, 03:55:42 PM »

England 7/174 the end is near...

D4D · « **Reply #166 on:** December 28, 2013, 03:56:43 PM »

England 8/174 can it get any worse...

alnjan · « **Reply #167 on:** December 28, 2013, 03:58:42 PM »

and Nathan Lyon on 4 for 49

Doweymex · « **Reply #168 on:** December 28, 2013, 04:06:17 PM »

Now he's 5'fa.
Good work getting Peterson

alnjan · « **Reply #169 on:** December 28, 2013, 04:15:19 PM »

Yep finished up 5 for 50 bowling well

D4D · « **Reply #170 on:** December 28, 2013, 04:25:56 PM »

Last 5 wickets fell for 6 runs...

Jasen · « **Reply #171 on:** December 28, 2013, 06:08:27 PM »

What were that actual innings scores?

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

D4D · « **Reply #172 on:** December 28, 2013, 06:21:45 PM »

Quote from: Jasen on December 28, 2013, 06:08:27 PM

What were that actual innings scores?

Poms didn't make enough

Jasen · « **Reply #173 on:** December 28, 2013, 06:22:32 PM »

I find cricket confusion at the best of times but I'm trying to search the scores online.

Any Australian newspaper I look at is saying Australia has already won all 5 tests and its a white wash and then I read UK sites and they say the forth test is still running and the scores are

First innings England 255 - Australia 204 am I missing something? Didn't England win the first innings?

Second innings England 179 - Australia 30/0

Can anyone explain this honestly without Aussie BS?

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

D4D · « **Reply #174 on:** December 28, 2013, 06:25:07 PM »

Quote from: Jasen on December 28, 2013, 06:22:32 PM

Can anyone explain this honestly without Aussie BS?

Typically not over until both sides have batted twice, so AUS need to make 200 tomorrow or the Poms take 10 wickets. Now given the Poms have only taken 10 wickets once this series and 200 runs will take about 50 overs when there are 180 overs left to play, at the end of play tomorrow it will be 4-0.

News:

Author Topic: OK, Now We Rock at cricket- What was I thinking :-) (Read 621291 times)