If you only got one crack out of that you should be happy. Not a lot of engineering going on there. If you did actually manage to lose 15 cu in 90m2 I would expect to see more than double the amount of steel. That's an average thickness of just under 200mm which we use for heavy vehicle aprons on factories. Double mesh and 45 degree bar at every corner and offset is pretty standard at that depth. As are starter bars in that existing slab and rock surrounds along with a splash of Abelflex.
Hi mate, can you just expand on this for me?
As this is only a domestic shed slab, would you say double mesh would have really gained me anything?
Also, are you saying there is a lot of (or too much) concrete in this sized slab?
Not that I'm planning on doing this again any time soon, but always interested to hear from those with more experience on ways to improve things.
I do reserve the right to choose if I want to follow any such advice though.
We did pin into the existing slab with 16mm rods every 400mm. We didn't pin the rocks.
I went up to SL82 in the mesh from the SL62 that was called up on the engineering specs.
I was a bit rough with the m2 calcs I used in my first post. It's a bit over 90m2.
The thickening beam along one side ate up a lot of material and my beams under the shed walls are closer to being 400x400 then the 200x200 on the engineering plans.
Plus the overall thickness was a little stuff up on my side. I had worked on having a step around 200mm up from the slab to the house, but after I had done all of my prep work I realized I only wanted a 145mm step. So we just thickened the whole lot to match the step.
Also the concretor did the fall along the rocks a bit different to how I expected when I built the wall, so there is a good 250mm in front of the bottom corse.