He darted right to avoid 88 and would not of even seen 33 so close. We are talking .5 sec decisions here.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's partially the point. Split second decisions.
If Tander backed of for a split second it may have all been fine, and I can't see the "whole field" passing in that short time frame.
If Tander actually turned his head he would have seen a blue Volvo entering too fast.
If the Volvo had of backed off marginally there would be no drama.
If Whincup had of not slowed so drastically, no problems.
A lot of if's, and all in split seconds.
But that's what these guys get paid the big bucks for, hours of split second decisions.
Whincup was the only one given a 15 second penalty but partial faults lay on all three drivers, it's just that he was the original instigator but was able to complete the race.
It has been my thought for years that if someone is taken out of the race by the actions of another driver, they should be given points based on a calculation between starting position. position at the time of the accident, what percentage of the race is completed etc.
That way at least a season is not destroyed by a mistake from a competitor.
The other thing I query is penalties for a turning wheel while in the air in the pits.
Is every team monitored for this or is it more based on the better teams that are receiving TV coverage that the marshal's are watching?
While having this whinge, why are the penalties so dramatic that they require drive through's. Why not have a pull off spot on a quiet part of the track where they have to pull to a stop, wait for 5, 10, or 20 seconds, dependent on the seriousness of the crime, and then re-start.
The time to slowly go through pit lane are a game killer for what is often a pretty tame error of judgement.