I'm against taxpayers paying for cycle ways, when the cost for one is for a minority and the cyclist pays nothing towards it .
As tk421 says that statement is just plain wrong. Cyclists are taxpayers the same as everyone else, and basically all road riders will also have at least one car, so are paying rego and insurances, same as other motorists.
Are you trying to suggest that as motorists pay rego, they are paying for roads? Again, as th421 says roads are paid from general revenue, so all taxpayers are paying for roads - whether they are driving or not.
Only my opinion..
I've got no problem with cyclists, but against a car, they will never win and most of the time it's going to hurt.
It's like playing russian roulette out on the roads, and I don't ride because I don't like the odds!
I have been commuting on Sydney roads for 8 years now, and ridden 26,000kms in that time. Never been hit by a car. I have to say, 99.999% of drivers are actually bloody awesome towards cyclists - as long as you are not being an idiot. There is of course the tiny minority of motorists who are simply f*ckwits whenever a cyclist is around.
They built bike lanes in Sydney....at great cost...and added to car congestion....and they don't get used....the cyclists still ride on the road ?
Rubbish. Cycle lane usage can be quite high at peak times. Maybe you need to be there when people are actually using them. How often are you driving past them?
"added to car congestion" - Not true. The lanes used were mostly parking lanes anyway so that argument has no basis. And guess what? Every cyclist riding, is another vehicle not added to traffic, so that reduces congestion.