Hi xcavator,
I don't own one and I havnt actually seen one close up. Apologies in advance as I know you wanted comments from owners only. I just wanted to add my 2 cents about the review in CTA magazine.
If this post doesn't suit this thread, PM me mate and I will remove
Muz.
Campertrailer Australia Magazine did a review on it a couple of issues ago.
Their heading went something like this: MDC claim that this crossover can handle anything anything you can throw at it in Australia, but can it handle the dirt roads around Broken Hill?
Apparantly not after reading the article - they were pretty scathing of it, infact the worst review on a camper I have read from them ever.
MDC = Make Direct Copies - it is a Chinese copied Lifestyle product. Stick with the original I think.
Here is the internet version of the review which has been watered down considerably - all the negative comments are missing (They must have received a letter!!): http://www.campertraileraustralia.com.au/campertrailer-reviews/1412/market-direct-campers-xtreme-terrain-xt-10-review/
One of the members in our 4wd club has just got one - it's first trip will be this Easter so I will report back on his opinions.
I can't comment positively or negatively on this MDC trailer other than to clear up a few things.
I have the December issue of CTA where they reviewed the MDC XT10. I have read and re-read the whole article.
The title of the story is
MDC claims it's Hybrid camper can handle anything you can throw at it, but can it handle Broken Hill? Not sure if it is the worst review ever in their magazine. The review wasn't great but to be fair I would also say that is was far from being scathing. There was some good and bad points mentioned. Did CTA actually receive a threatening letter from MDC?
The main difference between the magazine article and the Internet version is the size (written words) of the review. The Internet version provides a
very small snippet of info compared to the magazine. It is true that there is some negatives missing from the Internet version but the positives are also missing, in fact, there is probably well over a thousand words missing from magazine version the Internet version.
Here is a pic of the review, the scores are out of 10. The worst score I can find is 5/10. Defo not a great score but I would have thought a bad score to be 1 or 2 out of 10.