OP, its off topic but the question has been asked.
There's no provision in the firearms acts around the country for the use of firearms for the protection of personal property. Police, police-like agencies and security companies have specific provisions in acts of parliament that allow for the carriage and use of firearms and other personal defensive equipment for the protection of human life only.
What that means is that if someone steals the money without threatening life there is no justification for the use of a firearm. If someone steals the money and in doing so threatens the life of the guard or any other person, and that threat is imminent, they can use a firearm in defence of themselves or the other person until the threat stops.
On the topic of share farming crab pots, its a low act, and its also illegal (unlawfully interfere with a lawful fishing operation), so its worth passing on to the Police or local Fisheries. No doubt if numbnuts has done it to these pots he's done it to loads of others without being caught.
Heres an interesting one for ya.
Just before the Olympics we run some counter terrorism training for bodyguards that looked after OS dignatories. So the scenario goes you are visiting a building, there are four body guards and a VIP. They get ambushed by 'terrorists' using simunitions (plastic projectiles in glock 19's - they hurt like hell) and the VIP gets rushed out of the room by two of the guards.
One guard gets shot and is down injured and the other engages with the two terrorists who then surrender and lay on the ground. The guard stands over them and then....
Shots are heard outside and the the two guards scream contact and help. The guard on his own hears this and has to decide what to do. He is yet to cuff the terrorists or search them.
So he shoots them both in the back to 'disable' them and runs off to help his mates.
He gets outside and its all over with the other terrorists down and the scenario ends. One of the two terrorists he shot in the back comes running out and a full on punch up ensures over him getting shot in the back point blank with an egg sized lump near his spine - that was funny.
Anyways. Justified or not to shoot them?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk