I've never heard of CRV cans before.
Maybe because I bought a six pack of the old cans about 5 years ago and haven't used them all yet. I don't use them on the stoves myself, only on blow torches.
With regard cans being clearly marked or not I think is beside the point. I don't think the message about the safety aspect of the CRV cans is getting out there to the consumer, or more to the point, the danger aspect of the old cans when used incorrectly.
Bingo! That would be true for many of us because you'll note that Daeyruk Youtube video was only posted up on 15th July 2013, presumably because their new patented invention was ready to roll off the production line then and naturally they want consumers to buy their cans. Piddling Oz recreational market be damned(only 4 million cookers), they were chasing the vast Asian day to day cooker market, where stove explosion incidents are more notorious, simply due to the sheer volume of useage. Hence they make the Korean news and no doubt many Asian news services while here in sleepy hollow it's all snooze stuff and consequently our Standards people are asleep at the wheel. The laugh is they only wake up to the potetial problem and knee-jerk via a couple of schoolgirl tales plus a woman from NZ on the Choice Facebook page and blame the cookers. Meanwhile, unlike LPG bottles with pressure relief valves, non-CRV cans are still pouring into the country, when private enterprise has solved another possible safety issue at negligible cost to the consumer, but no-one can buy a cooker to use them.
It aint the cookers guys. Its the potential of gas cans without pressure relief valves to go bang in a big way if they're heated beyond their limit and even more so should you further confine them in a tin box. That's just the physics of expanding gases and Daeyruk hammer the point with that model single room and the windows blowing out and the roof jumping up.
