As I also wrote in my post, I like the KK and would buy depending on what where I intend to use it.
The owner has to take some responsibility, as I said in my original post, I advised our friends against
buying the unit due to what I had read and my concerns regarding the units weight and being able to
go anywhere your car can go. I knew the friend concerned would expect it to do as advertised and
certainly would not be the type to stop every half hour or so to let shockers cool etc.
It is not one or two failures, if you do some research on the net you will find many complaining of the
same issues. Also two friends one who has experienced the failure with his own unit, the other friend
who seem similar with a KK unit last year on the club trip is not a good statistic, keep in mind where
only discussing the KK unit, not all kimberly products in general.
Friends in their action had representation from an independent engineer arguing the suspension and chassis
is not fit for purpose, ie can go anywhere you car can go, clearly in my friends case it couldn't! Kimberly didn't
even bother providing independent engineer testimony, judge asked the Kimberly representative where is your
technical expert the Kimberly person replied there's just me and the Judge replied then you know where this is
heading then. The judge agreed with the not fit for purpose.
As I said above, I would still consider buying the unit, if I didn't intend to do hard off road work. The shocker
situation I would live with as I always stop every 40 minutes or so and check anyway.
The OP asked for comment regarding the KK and I believe he should be aware of the issues to be able to make
an informed decision, it's a bit late reading about it on their forum after you have already purchased the product,
which raises another issue, if the Kimberly product is so good why do you have to own one to be able to access the forum? other manufactures forums are open, the manufactures are prepared to take the good and the bad why don't Kimberly do the same?