I know how FTTP is supposed to work cyberhuey, but I also know how it's almost certainly gunna be and that's FTTN in a nation of 23mill that you can fit this lot into-
http://sapphiredreamsxox.blogspot.com.au/2012/01/australia-map.html
Which means the enthusiatic freeloading 20 percenters who use 80% of the download bandwith at present are going to have to dip into their pockets if they want the last km of fibre and ONT in their home. Tell Conroy he's dreaming with Mother Hubbard's cupboard now.
Perhaps, im not a fan of conroys strange ideas he gets but FTTH is def the way of the future, but having said that 23mil ppl aint all going to get FTTH, they never were in the first place, thats what the wireless and satellite is for the country folk. FTTH as my understanding was for major population areas. Its rolling past my place around end 2014 (projected), of course assuming labor is still in power which i'd doubt very much whilst gillard is at the helm, but if abbott gets in dismantling all those existing NBN contracts signed with the likes of ServiceStream, TSL and others will become expensive exercise imo for existing planned contracted rollout work.
Anything not yet planned/contracted for will prob end up the way of FTTN which will end up with the same issues we have today with adsl reliability problems due to copper degradation, water in pits causing ahorts, pair gaining technology which causes issues as well.
http://delimiter.com.au/2012/04/30/fttn-a-huge-mistake-says-ex-bt-cto/ talks about why FTTN is a bad idea, done in the UK and a total failure.
http://nbnmyths.wordpress.com/why-not-fttn/ talks about FTTN how its a stop gap measure and countries that did fttn ended up ripping it out and doing FTTP/FTTH, that would have been damn expensive doing it twice... Do it once and do it right, therefore FTTH is the right way to go.
Fair enough doing it in this country of a small population isnt going to be cheap but planning for the future isnt meant to be, as for 20% who downlosd 80% of the bandwidth (freeloaders) isnt a reason not to rollout FTTH, video on demand, telecommuting, having a reliabile connected network, you are not going to get that with copper which some of it has been in the ground since 50s, it will be more expensive to replace the copper in the ground than fibre esp at copper ore prices.
But yup we'll prob end up with loony turnbulls fttn idea when the libs get in and then we'll have to pay again to replace it when it ends up a failure than the original nbn plan. Not to mention how tel$tra will be delighted with glee on how much more they can ream us for using their copper just to get fttn technology......