Author Topic: Vehicle Running Costs and Emissions Compared  (Read 1726 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

UIZ733

  • Guest
Vehicle Running Costs and Emissions Compared
« on: December 21, 2011, 02:50:38 PM »

Offline Fivid

  • Hard Floor Camper User
  • *****
  • Posts: 1055
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • Gender: Male
Re: Vehicle Running Costs and Emissions Compared
« Reply #1 on: December 21, 2011, 06:45:55 PM »
Think that site needs some work...  the variants for a Patrol are not even manufactured....  4 different dual cab options and a 35th anniversary edition...  Other thing s I looked at had basic flaws also.  Models that are produced with 6 cyl or 8 cyl options don't have those options available.  Pretty hard to get realistic / meaningful data if you can't make correct selections.  OR maybe they think that if you want to run a V8 you are not interested in emmissions?

 :cheers:
Dave
http://www.trailtrack4x4.com/


Offline grafy82

  • Hard Floor Camper User
  • *****
  • Posts: 825
  • Thanked: 41 times
  • Gender: Male
Re: Vehicle Running Costs and Emissions Compared
« Reply #2 on: December 24, 2011, 01:43:35 AM »
Yeah like most things the green controlled government comes up with that site is pretty unrealistic and useless. I read a report recently that takes into account a vehicles life from start of manufacturing to being scraped and parts recycled and interestingly the humble jeep wrangler was greener (over complete life cycle) than the Toyota Prius. Makes you wonder eh.

Regards

Wes
My Trailer Build
http://www.myswag.org/index.php?topic=16864.0

You can't believe everything you read on the Internet. - Julius Caesar